Thetis Receiving the Weapons of Achilles from Hephaestus Thetis, how could you join forces with Van Dyck letting your hero’s arms for cupids to rejoice and use as toys? You both seem to have got it wrong as many things in this canvas are off-sight, though being artistically god-damn right. Take the shape of the shield – measuring the man, realist van Dyck turned Homer’s epic round design into an efficient breastplate, but neither the pushing hands of smith and cupid, nor the aid of Thetis can lift this naturalistic motive to the original first ekphrastic narrative. Further down the trend is the mocking of the hero by putting his big helmet onto the small cupid’s head, and its crumbling creates a bad omen, as any Homeric man would have said; and which van Dyck knew first-hand, as the fall from the wall of his portrait of archbishop Laud pre-cursed his holiness’ fall from grace to grave. I get it that Van Dyck’s playful points could count as a lively antithesis to his stiff dressed-to-impress age, but such a childish detail can hardly be an emancipating tool for the poignant Homeric ideal. I get the counter point – an artistic deride of the ancient hyperbolism, as van Dyck wanted to turn myth into a daily bread for the hero-hungry world, but the juxtaposed steps of graceful Thetis and clumsy Hephaestus can hardly make a resolving stride. Above all, the heart of the matter cries: why Thetis, why did you order a shield, since you created his guarding coat with the dip in the waters of Styx and knew the only spot that remained unwashed – why didn’t you order Achilles a protection for his now proverbial heel, stamped by your holding hand? Answers van Dyck – brushing the light from the unseen furnace to iconize her face, and sending her train like fireball to unfold upon the ultimate perspective of God, stretching infinitely her troubled thought, but holding the looming future undisclosed, while all the rest are amused with demystifying the crux, no one grasping the simple factual flaw, where Fate normally nests her blow. By default, they all fill the off-sight bill; while the hero’s doomed spirit reels in the air and in the mind of the wired beholder. Myth and reality, mother and art, cupid and smith bestowing and withholding to revive anew the idolized paradigm in one go until mother Earth’s face is burnished with its glow! Ekaterina Dukas Ekaterina Dukas, MA, has studied and taught linguistics and culture at Universities of Sofia, Delhi and London and authored a book on medieval art for the British Library. She writes poetry as a pilgrimage to the meaning and her poems appeared in The Ekphrastic Review, its challenges and Poetrywivenhoe among others. Her poetry collection Ekphrasticon is published by Europa Edizioni, 2021.
0 Comments
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
The Ekphrastic Review
COOKIES/PRIVACY
This site uses cookies to deliver your best navigation experience this time and next. Continuing here means you consent to cookies. Thank you. Join us on Facebook:
October 2024
|